Where Science Meets Engineering

Search ISOGKP

ISOGKP · Where Science Meets Engineering

Case study: capacity design, detailing and review

Complete the workflow from analysis interpretation to coordinated review.

Module 9: Practical design workflowLesson 20/2017 min
Expert/source verification requiredEdition-dependent or normative details must be confirmed against the adopted standard and National Annex before project use.
Capacity designMember verificationDetailingDrawingsEngineering reviewDocumentation

Learning objectives

In this lesson

  • Capacity design turns mechanism into protected actions.
  • Drawings must express analytical intent.

Engineering explanation

Steps 11–14: select the intended dissipative mechanism and protected actions; verify members using applicable material and seismic provisions; translate the mechanism into critical-region, confinement, anchorage, shear and interface details; reconcile calculations, model, drawings, specifications and review comments. A reviewer must trace each important result to an input, assumption, model decision and applicable source. Unresolved National Annex choices, edition-dependent criteria and constructability conflicts remain open actions, never silent assumptions.

Key takeaways

What to carry forward

  • Capacity design turns mechanism into protected actions.
  • Drawings must express analytical intent.
  • Independent review verifies traceability.
Ask Eurocode Doctor →